Page 37 of 72

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 6:30 pm
by piffdog
Do we prefer Ratagolea (sorry for the spelling) over Frampton? If so would we roll that into the Henry trade somehow?

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 6:34 pm
by stui magpie
My read is we're into Frampton to replace Roughead. Blunt instrument KPD who's capable of rucking. McStay would fill the same role up forward, meaning Sav v2 isn't required.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:12 pm
by Santo
stui magpie wrote:Apparently he was offered a new 1 year contract on more cash and declined, so it's not about money.

There's a fine balance to be walked here between wanting appropriate compensation, pushing back hard enough to make it clear we aren't push overs and pushing back too far and sending him to the draft.

IMHO doing the latter sends the message to the players that we don't care about them as people, just commodities
If Geelong aren't even offering pick 18 then unfortunately for Ollie it's the draft it is then - or sign on with Collingwood.

Mackie is taking a big gamble and I know he is a gambling man when I was working in a dodgy money laundering bookie in Vanuatu I was taking some huge bets from him.

Dodgy as ****.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:30 pm
by watt price tully
My gut tells me to let him go to the draft
My head is not so sure
My hands say up yours Geelong
My arse says sit on it
My brain has mixed emotions but mostly pissed off so not a good way to make a sound decision.
My eyes tell me we’re getting ripped off with such a low offer
My gut says eat
My conscience says don’t

I want a high first round pick or two second round picks with trading a 3rd round …

In a nutshell I’m not sure.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:41 pm
by Pies4shaw
We are repeat players in this area, so we simply cannot allow Henry to get to Geelong for an unacceptably low draft pick. That is, this transaction is not about "doing the best we can with a bad hand". That's what you do when you own a single asset on a casual basis and it takes a bit of a price hit, for whatever reason - you do the best you can to salvage something and move on. Rather, this is about setting market expectations about how Collingwood will deal with such matters, going forward. You all need to stop thinking about it like it's anything other than a business transaction. It's a trivial one, to be sure - but still just a commercial transaction, all the same.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:50 pm
by Piesnchess
Santo wrote:
stui magpie wrote:Apparently he was offered a new 1 year contract on more cash and declined, so it's not about money.

There's a fine balance to be walked here between wanting appropriate compensation, pushing back hard enough to make it clear we aren't push overs and pushing back too far and sending him to the draft.

IMHO doing the latter sends the message to the players that we don't care about them as people, just commodities
If Geelong aren't even offering pick 18 then unfortunately for Ollie it's the draft it is then - or sign on with Collingwood.

Mackie is taking a big gamble and I know he is a gambling man when I was working in a dodgy money laundering bookie in Vanuatu I was taking some huge bets from him.

Dodgy as ****.


Yeh, even Andy Maher was mystified today, how Geebung can flash the coin around, get choice draft picks, so much for equalisation theory. I have NO doubt someone down there is cooking the books, nudge nudge, wink wink say no more, cash in brown paper bags caper. Maher did not exactly say, it but he almost called them cheating the system. This Mackie sounds dodgy, been to Vanuatu myself, massive cut price cheap booze, very shifty place, nice tax haven no doubt. :P

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:50 pm
by Cam
watt price tully wrote:My gut tells me to let him go to the draft
My head is not so sure
My hands say up yours Geelong
My arse says sit on it
My brain has mixed emotions but mostly pissed off so not a good way to make a sound decision.
My eyes tell me we’re getting ripped off with such a low offer
My gut says eat
My conscience says don’t

I want a high first round pick or two second round picks with trading a 3rd round …

In a nutshell I’m not sure.
This sums alot of us up WPT. Brilliant post.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:04 pm
by inxs88
The little turd Andrew "never had a real job in his life" Mackie posturing over the Henry trade with corporate speak words such as "common value" etc..... STFU Andrew and pay up for once!!

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:34 pm
by Ronnie McKeowns boots
Pies4shaw wrote:We are repeat players in this area, so we simply cannot allow Henry to get to Geelong for an unacceptably low draft pick. That is, this transaction is not about "doing the best we can with a bad hand". That's what you do when you own a single asset on a casual basis and it takes a bit of a price hit, for whatever reason - you do the best you can to salvage something and move on. Rather, this is about setting market expectations about how Collingwood will deal with such matters, going forward. You all need to stop thinking about it like it's anything other than a business transaction. It's a trivial one, to be sure - but still just a commercial transaction, all the same.
It's not though, is it?

I mean, yeas this is a business, but its not based solely on inputs and outputs, there are intangibles in football that contribute to success, like not screwing over a player who clearly wants out....a player who could not crack the 22 during a finals campaign I might add. Not a good look for current, future or other club potential players, particularly given our record with Treloar's departure.

I can imagine some soulless bean counter in Saint Kilda making the same kind of pitch to Ross the Loony about Ball in 2009; worked out well for them.....

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:53 pm
by Ronnie McKeowns boots
Fair dinkum, you guys are kidding yourselves; pick 7 for a bloke who couldn't crack the 22 of the 3rd best team for a finals campaign? He had a few good games, and looks good; that's not worth more than a late first rounder at most...and really that would be generous.

Its a shame he wants to leave, but you can't expect full return on investment on this one, as others have pointed out sometimes it goes our way, like with Rocca

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:27 pm
by eddiesmith
A first round draft pick who is a required player with a contract offer in front of him and 2 years development in the system.

It’d be crazy to accept anything less than a first round pick in return.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:30 pm
by burnsy17
This one is not a priority for us. Wright knows it. Geelong know it.

This will sit in the background until late in the piece when Geelong get desperate and throw overs at us.

Remember they need to work out the Bruhn trade as well, and GWS are playing hardball on that one.

Geelong will need to find picks from somewhere. I reckon it’ll be their first rounder next year.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:45 am
by Piesnchess
BLEED THE HANDBAGGER PRICKS DRY. BLEED THEM. STUFF EM. MAKE EM SWEAT.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:19 am
by swoop42
We wont be getting pick 7 from the Cats so it's best to not get all worked up about it.

They'll take it to the draft most likely or possibly look to deal with GWS or Sydney and exchange it for two 1st round selections.

Potentially they could even look to trade pick 7 for Bruhn and GWS pick 12 if they wanted to retain their future 1st.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:33 am
by uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Make an offer to geelong for his brother Jack!!... They can play in the VFL together