Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:31 am
......
Alert Graham Wright:
"DON'T ACCEPT PICK 25 & 33 FOR HENRY OTHERWISE JAN 6TH INSURGENCY IS ON"!
Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://nick.magpies.net/
#35,#16 Oliver Henry
Page 52 of 72
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:24 am
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:28 am
I assume that means you running around your front yard throwing pillows at pot plants
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:33 am
Da fuq?inxs88 wrote:Alert Graham Wright:
"DON'T ACCEPT PICK 25 & 33 FOR HENRY OTHERWISE JAN 6TH INSURGENCY IS ON"!
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:37 am
Pick 33 would cover the cost of the Mitchell trade, could be used in trade for a future 2nd round selection or bundled with another pick to try and make our way up this years draft board.
Effectively we could turn Henry in to pick 25 and Mitchell or 25 and Hill (because we restored the future 2nd used on him).
Not the result we were after originally but forcing Geelong to trade away some flexible KP depth in Esava would be a little win.
No way should we accept pick 25 on it's own.
Effectively we could turn Henry in to pick 25 and Mitchell or 25 and Hill (because we restored the future 2nd used on him).
Not the result we were after originally but forcing Geelong to trade away some flexible KP depth in Esava would be a little win.
No way should we accept pick 25 on it's own.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:18 am
How bad do Geelong want Henry? Would they only deal Esava to get Ollie? (Seems like Port are ok to give up #33).
What if the Cats deal and then we say "no thanks"? They lose their player but don't get Henry - would feel good, but make it hard to deal with them in future.
If we had #16, #25, #27 (Grundy), #33, #41 could we do something better with that before draft night? Presume maybe #33 goes out for Mitchell if Grundy goes. Fiorini? #41? We go to the draft with 16, 25, 27?
Would we try and trade out #27 for a second rounder next year (which would restore us back to having all our future picks? Would depend who to suppose.
Anyway - I am getting off topic.
What if the Cats deal and then we say "no thanks"? They lose their player but don't get Henry - would feel good, but make it hard to deal with them in future.
If we had #16, #25, #27 (Grundy), #33, #41 could we do something better with that before draft night? Presume maybe #33 goes out for Mitchell if Grundy goes. Fiorini? #41? We go to the draft with 16, 25, 27?
Would we try and trade out #27 for a second rounder next year (which would restore us back to having all our future picks? Would depend who to suppose.
Anyway - I am getting off topic.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:20 am
I reckon Stui might have the buffalo horns hat we need for that!inxs88 wrote:Alert Graham Wright:
"DON'T ACCEPT PICK 25 & 33 FOR HENRY OTHERWISE JAN 6TH INSURGENCY IS ON"!
Henry has been a matchwinner at an early age. Those two picks get us shit and shitter as an exchange.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:44 am
piffdog wrote:How bad do Geelong want Henry? Would they only deal Esava to get Ollie? (Seems like Port are ok to give up #33).
What if the Cats deal and then we say "no thanks"? They lose their player but don't get Henry - would feel good, but make it hard to deal with them in future.
If we had #16, #25, #27 (Grundy), #33, #41 could we do something better with that before draft night? Presume maybe #33 goes out for Mitchell if Grundy goes. Fiorini? #41? We go to the draft with 16, 25, 27?
Would we try and trade out #27 for a second rounder next year (which would restore us back to having all our future picks? Would depend who to suppose.
Anyway - I am getting off topic.
It's Geelong's job to do the heavy lifting and satisfy the Pies and Henry's choice. If they want to go to market and turn 25 & 33 into a sub 15 draft pick and pass onto us, great. NOT OUR JOB to turn shit into champagne
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:51 am
Hopefully #50 and or #51 will get us Fiorini.
If we have to take #27 and #33 for Ollie we can then use #33 for Mitchell or even #41.
Leaving us with #16 #25 #27 #33 or #41 and maybe #50 or #51
Im not happy to accept #25 and #33 but would rather have that if the bridges are burnt between Henry and the club. Best case scenario is he stays a pie.
If we have to take #27 and #33 for Ollie we can then use #33 for Mitchell or even #41.
Leaving us with #16 #25 #27 #33 or #41 and maybe #50 or #51
Im not happy to accept #25 and #33 but would rather have that if the bridges are burnt between Henry and the club. Best case scenario is he stays a pie.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 11:09 am
And all that is exactly how the footy dept should be thinking.swoop42 wrote:Pick 33 would cover the cost of the Mitchell trade, could be used in trade for a future 2nd round selection or bundled with another pick to try and make our way up this years draft board.
Effectively we could turn Henry in to pick 25 and Mitchell or 25 and Hill (because we restored the future 2nd used on him).
Not the result we were after originally but forcing Geelong to trade away some flexible KP depth in Esava would be a little win.
No way should we accept pick 25 on it's own.
Any climb up the draft order won’t likely be seen during the trade period but if it proves we don’t have the cap room to bring in more players, you might as well have the picks to make a move up the draft order ( providing you have some picks in the first place, of course )
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 11:50 am
This deserves more focus!BBHS wrote:I assume that means you running around your front yard throwing pillows at pot plants
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 12:25 pm
Pick 33 is pick 33 (well, possibly 36 when it's pushed back).swoop42 wrote:Pick 33 would cover the cost of the Mitchell trade, could be used in trade for a future 2nd round selection or bundled with another pick to try and make our way up this years draft board.
Effectively we could turn Henry in to pick 25 and Mitchell or 25 and Hill (because we restored the future 2nd used on him).
Not the result we were after originally but forcing Geelong to trade away some flexible KP depth in Esava would be a little win.
No way should we accept pick 25 on it's own.
What we do with it doesn't make the deal any better. If we want Mitchell (not bothered myself) we could find a way to get that done easily enough without involving the Henry deal. Though with Gunston and now potentially O'Meara leaving, Hawks may no longer be so set on trading Mitchell.
Losing a pick 17, we want to get a single pick as close to that as possible, not spread it out over multiple picks. 33 (or 36) isn't really a sweetener to us this draft I don't think. Not impossible we'd accept it, but it's definitely not what we'd want.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 12:51 pm
Take Henry off the table now, enough is enough, stuff the tightarse Handbag bastards, they annoy me now, like NO other team.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 1:03 pm
The position remains that Collingwood must obtain a high first-round pick (below the pick with which we took Henry, since he's had two years of development and demonstrated that he can actually play, unlike many first-round picks) or else Geelong should be told to go **** themselves. It is simply unacceptable - given the soft mindset it signifies - to allow Geelong to get Henry in a deal by which we "cut our losses". The long-term damage to our standing as a trade negotiator would far outweigh the benefit of having a pick that would allow us to recruit the next Ryan Cook, Jarrad Blight or Jay Rantall.
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 1:54 pm
After Grundy goes for 27, if we chicken out and let Geelong lowball us for Ollie I’ll be very feisty.