Important Query regarding this year's draft

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
snow24
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 2:14 pm

Important Query regarding this year's draft

Post by snow24 »

I haven't written the pies off just yet. Infact with a little bit of luck and spirit I think we can still sneak into the eight. However, if worse comes to worse and we finish poorly and get some good picks this question has to be asked.

It is my understanding that this year's draft age has been raised either 6 months or a year. Wouldn't this imply that this was possibly the worst year's draft to have the top picks in? That we are only getting hacks that didn't cut it last year or a few good players that decided not to nominate last year?

<A little help from the Mods>
User avatar
themonk
Posts: 2225
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by themonk »

I've heard that this years draft is a strong one, but we will have to wait & see.
User avatar
Blanch
Posts: 1256
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Back in Perth!
Contact:

Post by Blanch »

You've heard?? Do tell where you've heard from. Who said it was strong?
My oxygen is Collingwood. Without it I die.

All WA Magpies join the Western Magpies now:
http://www.westernmagpies.com
(At least go and sign the guestbook).
User avatar
Shades
Posts: 443
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 2:48 pm

Post by Shades »

yes, i heard it was a strong draft year. from two sources. One was triple M a few weeks ago. I can't remember the other source. Last year was a poor draft year.
User avatar
Nath
Posts: 2014
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Victoria

Post by Nath »

My father and brother work within the TAC structure with the Calder Cannons, and the draft this year isn't going to be as strong as what people think. The top 20 players will be standouts, so each team theoretically will pick up a decent player, however the depth will bottom out after picks 30+, thats the opinion floating around the TAC anyway
User avatar
themonk
Posts: 2225
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by themonk »

unfortunately my source was triple m too.
d9 tank
Posts: 700
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Post by d9 tank »

Nath sounds good to me, we should have three picks inside the top 20 by the end of the season.
User avatar
sherrife
Posts: 3037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 11:20 pm
Contact:

Post by sherrife »

Yep, and we should trade every single one of em.
I would be ashamed to admit that I had risen from the ranks. When I rise it will be with the ranks... - Eugene Debs
Presti_is_god
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:24 pm

Post by Presti_is_god »

May I ask why Sheriffe???
Post Reply