#18 Darren Jolly

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

wo5
Posts: 591
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:53 pm

#18 Darren Jolly

Post by wo5 »

http://realfooty.com.au/news/news/swan- ... id=rss_top

SYDNEY ruckman Darren Jolly may play his last game for the Swans this weekend, with the lure of a return to Victoria said to be tempting him away from the SCG.

The 25-year-old, who will split Sydney's centre-square responsibilities with Peter Everitt in Saturday night's elimination final against Collingwood, is out of contract at the end of the season and is understood to be contemplating a return to Melbourne to resettle his wife and infant daughter closer to family.
It is understood that as many as six clubs have expressed interest in acquiring Jolly. The Western Bulldogs, Carlton, St Kilda, Melbourne, Richmond and Collingwood are all in the market for ruckmen in a year that isn't offering many opportunities to recruit one through the draft
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

We need to try Really Hard to Get Him
I am Da Man
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19594
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Not the best option going around but surely a better one than either Bryan or Richards
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
ktszyu1
Posts: 1675
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:12 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by ktszyu1 »

I'm not sure I would want to see an early draft pick traded for him. With the lack of depth in this years draft, we can't afford to blow our first couple of picks on him. We really need those inside mids, and a young ruckman. But I would love to have Jolly, so I'm not sure what to offer.
"We're goin places."
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I think we can Trade Brodie Holland and Cook Maybe?
I am Da Man
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19594
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

I reckon Cook will be a solid player for us Dave, I wouldn't trade him.

Let's dick em like they did with us on Davis.

Obviously they'll be after another ruckman. We could trade either of Richards or Bryan + a late draft pick

Or, give them both without the draft pick. Not a lot to lose if you ask me
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54657
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 72 times
Been liked: 74 times

Post by stui magpie »

Anybody remember what the Swans gave up to get him in the first place? It wasn't a very high pick from memory.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
tommo
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:21 pm

Post by tommo »

frankiboy wrote:I reckon Cook will be a solid player for us Dave, I wouldn't trade him.

Let's dick em like they did with us on Davis.

Obviously they'll be after another ruckman. We could trade either of Richards or Bryan + a late draft pick

Or, give them both without the draft pick. Not a lot to lose if you ask me
Can't see us getting rid of both ruckman. We only have 3 on our list, getting rid of 2 of them would be a horrible move!
Black and White - Through and Through - Side by Side - Us against Them
User avatar
Streak
Posts: 1045
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Streak »

frankiboy wrote:Let's dick em like they did with us on Davis.
Not possible, with 6 clubs after his signature. Davis held us to ransom and demanded a trade to one, specific club. Different scenario. If we don't offer what Sydney want, they will deal with another club.
User avatar
BJ
Posts: 1786
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: All around the place

Post by BJ »

stui magpie wrote:Anybody remember what the Swans gave up to get him in the first place? It wasn't a very high pick from memory.
Pick 19 I think
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody.
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Dave The Man wrote:I think we can Trade Brodie Holland and Cook Maybe?
No offence to either but I don't think the Swans would be interested, they would be looking for someone to possibly replace Jolly plus a pick in the draft. Neither Cook or Holland are a ruckman so they wouldn't be wanted unless the Swans wanted them plus a pick,
User avatar
sq3
Posts: 3668
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:23 pm
Location: Gold Coast/Tampa

Post by sq3 »

If (that's a big if) we trade with the Swans they would be looking for a taller forward type - as Hall and O'Loughlin are on their last legs and a replacement would be handy.

We do have a lot but all too valuable so I think we trade somewhere else, draft picks only or multiple club trade.
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19594
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Streak wrote:
frankiboy wrote:Let's dick em like they did with us on Davis.
Not possible, with 6 clubs after his signature. Davis held us to ransom and demanded a trade to one, specific club. Different scenario. If we don't offer what Sydney want, they will deal with another club.
Not entirely impossible Streak. If we were able to entice Jolly with a sweet offer he could then prompt his club to do a trade or risk losing him for nothing. It's a longshot, but not out of the question.
That is basically the scenario we were left with Davis, no choice but to accept their offer of I think it was pick 23.
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19594
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

tommo wrote:
frankiboy wrote:I reckon Cook will be a solid player for us Dave, I wouldn't trade him.

Let's dick em like they did with us on Davis.

Obviously they'll be after another ruckman. We could trade either of Richards or Bryan + a late draft pick

Or, give them both without the draft pick. Not a lot to lose if you ask me
Can't see us getting rid of both ruckman. We only have 3 on our list, getting rid of 2 of them would be a horrible move!
Yeh, you're probably right, I'd much prefer to go with the 1st option of Richards or Bryan + a late draft pick
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

The Prototype wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I think we can Trade Brodie Holland and Cook Maybe?
No offence to either but I don't think the Swans would be interested, they would be looking for someone to possibly replace Jolly plus a pick in the draft. Neither Cook or Holland are a ruckman so they wouldn't be wanted unless the Swans wanted them plus a pick,
In that case they can have Bryan and our 2nd Round Pick
I am Da Man
Post Reply