Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
ODI World Cup 2023

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 51, 52, 53
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2023 7:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Lotta media chatter 'bout the FTB LBW non-review.

“Steve Smith is convinced every LBW ever given against him isn’t out except for the one that isn’t actually out.”
-- Ben Gardner, Wisden Cricket


Pic of ball-tracking:
https://twitter.com/Cricketracker/status/1726231853508808794

But it's a close call, innit? The pic looks odd, 'cos it looks like the bat is behind the ball. Of course, really, the ball is behind the bat. Have to take the bat away in your mind.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Scott Bailey (AAP): “The one time Steve Smith doesn’t review …”

Aatif Nawaz (BBC Test Match Special): “A huge mistake from Steve Smith. The replay showed impact was way outside off. …”


"Way outside"?? Outside, sure, but way outside? If it were way outside maybe the umpire and Head woulda seen...


Some crazy "theories" too...

Bharat Sundaresun (cricbuzz) suggested FTB Smith knew Bumrah's ball was too good for him and decided Bumrah deserved his wicket. Shocked Crazy!! There's no way FTB would think that!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2023 8:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What worries me is that all the media talk of Smith's "huge brainfade" will stop him doing the team thing (not reviewing his LBW) ever again.

Sheesh... If it really were so clearly impact outside, the ump woulda given it not out. And Head woulda told Smith to review. Head told Him something like "don't ask me".
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

My take:


* Smith may have felt pressure from his teammates over always blowing their reviews on his plumb LBWs.


* When reviews LBWs he's usually deluded that it's missing the stumps. Usually leg stump. He has no clue where his stumps are.

Here it was obviously crashing into the stumps.

He is not usually thinking about impact outside the line. Batters who have footwork are saved by this more. He doesn't have real footwork. He's usually trapped on the crease or behind it. He just shuffles across the crease. So he prolly didn't think about whether it was impact with pad outside the line.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 7:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Save it for when he wins the next World Cup.

You're just spamming the board, now.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:06 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt Hayden:

“You can shake your head as many times as you want, but it’s crashing into the stumps.”

(on Smith's LBW against S. Africa)
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 51, 52, 53
Page 53 of 53   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group