View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: Kinglsey? | |
|
He is 28, can play defensive football one on one. Worth a look at in my opinion. We do not have a lot of expierence down the back line and can come in for Wakes when he is injured. |
|
|
|
|
STOKA35
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Mount Barker. South Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
kingsley is not that tall culprit i would not think that kingsley could play fullback.He has won a best and fairest so he could be worth a look had a lot of injuries this year. |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
I was thinking more a flanker than full back. His expierence would be a plus. They are saying Port may pick him up again, just grab him to piss them off. |
|
|
|
|
d9 tank
Joined: 04 Oct 2002 Location: Victoria
|
Post subject: | |
|
There pick is before ours anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 26 Jul 2000
|
Post subject: Bo Nixon | |
|
Very injury prone and wouldnt waste my time
there is a kid like Bo Nixon who is of similar height and played down back this year at willy
rather play Bo then pick up a player that also lacks pace and is injury prone and old |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
Good point member. I am a big rap for Bo, shows a heap of promise. I was looking at more his expierence.
With the later draft picks would we go for an expierenced player (100 games) or stick with a youth policy. What's your opinion member? Naturally it depends on whats on offer. |
|
|
|
|
I_love_Clokey
Joined: 30 Aug 2003 Location: Adelaide
|
|
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 26 Jul 2000
|
Post subject: | |
|
Thanks Culprit
you always make good points
we have 5 picks in the national draft
two will be used on farther sons
pick 17 and 35 will be used
and pick 64 will be passed on so we have a pick in the pre season draft |
|
|
|
|
|