|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
Post subject: | |
|
Magpietothemax wrote: | Hell, K, they are such damning stats. We are outliers, along with GC. I hate being an outlier with GC. |
Here's something else (3 July):
https://twitter.com/sirswampthing/status/1146425464082165760
Looks like a pretty random stat at a totally random time, but gotta wonder when random stuff always has us as the outlier.
"Games experience named on this week's injury list
1420 - COLL
1075 - SYD
921 - FREM
916 - HAW
858 - STK
850 - MELB
820 - GWS
641 - ESS
635 - NTH
532 - RICH
495 - GEEL
428 - PORT
409 - WBD
399 - ADEL
384 - GCS
334 - CARL
272 - WCE
94 - BRIS" |
|
|
|
|
Magpietothemax
magpietothemax
Joined: 27 Apr 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
K wrote: | Magpietothemax wrote: | Hell, K, they are such damning stats. We are outliers, along with GC. I hate being an outlier with GC. |
Here's something else (3 July):
https://twitter.com/sirswampthing/status/1146425464082165760
Looks like a pretty random stat at a totally random time, but gotta wonder when random stuff always has us as the outlier.
"Games experience named on this week's injury list
1420 - COLL
1075 - SYD
921 - FREM
916 - HAW
858 - STK
850 - MELB
820 - GWS
641 - ESS
635 - NTH
532 - RICH
495 - GEEL
428 - PORT
409 - WBD
399 - ADEL
384 - GCS
334 - CARL
272 - WCE
94 - BRIS" |
As you say, quite a random stat, but what does appear to be a constant regardless of the randomness is :
there is a strong correlation between Collingwood and outlier status in regard to no. of injuries/games missed through injury/
TBH, if we did not do a single trade in the upcoming trade period, and simply kept our current list intact, but instead improved our injury related stats to simply lying within the median range band, this would be almost enough to win the Premiership. Our list is already so close, and the nightmarish injury debacle played a major role in undermining our campaign this year. _________________ Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Magpietothemax wrote: | K wrote: | Magpietothemax wrote: | Hell, K, they are such damning stats. We are outliers, along with GC. I hate being an outlier with GC. |
Here's something else (3 July):
https://twitter.com/sirswampthing/status/1146425464082165760
Looks like a pretty random stat at a totally random time, but gotta wonder when random stuff always has us as the outlier.
"Games experience named on this week's injury list
1420 - COLL
1075 - SYD
921 - FREM
916 - HAW
858 - STK
850 - MELB
820 - GWS
641 - ESS
635 - NTH
532 - RICH
495 - GEEL
428 - PORT
409 - WBD
399 - ADEL
384 - GCS
334 - CARL
272 - WCE
94 - BRIS" |
As you say, quite a random stat, but what does appear to be a constant regardless of the randomness is :
there is a strong correlation between Collingwood and outlier status in regard to no. of injuries/games missed through injury/ seas
TBH, if we did not do a single trade in the upcoming trade period, and simply kept our current list intact, but instead improved our injury related stats to simply lying within the median range band, this would be almost enough to win the Premiership. Our list is already so close, and the nightmarish injury
debacle played a major role in undermining our campaign this year. |
Surely it’s time to have a good run with injuries at Collingwood 😠 If these are random acts, it’s about bloody time we had a lucky break instead of a break in a bone😡 make no bones about it, I have had it with broken bodies that lead to broken hearts among supporters🥺 it’s about bloody time to have a good run 🙏🙏👌🏿 C’mon footy gods, time to give us some good luck👏 _________________ Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
Adz
Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: Heidelberg
|
Post subject: | |
|
Our record against interstate teams at the G, is pretty average.
Good team don’t get beaten on their home turf against Giants, Freo, WC ETC. |
|
|
|
|
Adz
Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: Heidelberg
|
Post subject: | |
|
Our record against interstate teams at the G, is pretty average.
Good team don’t get beaten on their home turf against Giants, Freo, WC ETC. |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Adz wrote: | Our record against interstate teams at the G, is pretty average.
Good team don’t get beaten on their home turf against Giants, Freo, WC ETC. |
Do Collingwood supporters overate our team thus perpetually setting ourselves up for failure and disappointment? Do we have totally misplaced and unrealistic expectations of a team that lacks a few KPP’s to really give the flag a shot? Do we ever learn? _________________ Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
|
|
|
|
Adz
Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: Heidelberg
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
At the start of the year we were called the greatest midfield ever. By the end of the year, we didn’t even make it in the top 5.
The only midfielder we have with polish is Pendles. The rest are scragglers. We need some class in there if we want to compete and not regress. |
|
|
|
|
thebaldfacts
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
A fit Beams and we would of been playing this week. |
|
|
|
|
choppa
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
thebaldfacts wrote: | A fit Beams and we would of been playing this week. |
Agreed fit beams and JDG and we would be favourites this week |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
I agree generally - but our two tall forwards having 6 disposals didn’t really pick up too much of the slack, there, either. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | RudeBoy wrote: | It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
I agree generally - but our two tall forwards having 6 disposals didn’t really pick up too much of the slack, there, either. |
That's true, but only because our genuine 2 main forwards - De Goey and Cox - were unavailable. |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
Yeah probably right there. Don’t know if I’m sulking or having a sooky sooky la la but I’m struggling big time to get excited about watching the GF. Still spewing about such a wasted opportunity🤨🙄🙄 _________________ Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Tigers sh***t me up the wall and the protected species AFL Inc. fair little better
I’m trying out my nu tarp tent at the Cann River free camping spot about 400 meter from pub —cannot decide 400 meter from camp to pub worth it _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
Damien
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999 Location: Croydon Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | RudeBoy wrote: | It was our midfielders, not our KPPs, who lost us the Prelim imo.
I reckon we may have overrated how good our mids are. |
I agree generally - but our two tall forwards having 6 disposals didn’t really pick up too much of the slack, there, either. |
That's true, but only because our genuine 2 main forwards - De Goey and Cox - were unavailable. |
And you’d hardly call either of them genuine forwards; not in the traditional mould anyway. I don’t think there is too much wrong with the list. We don’t need to throw the baby out with the bath water. _________________ 'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|