Brad Sewell?
Moderator: bbmods
- WhyPhilWhy?
- Posts: 9547
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: Location: Location:
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 37 times
Brad Sewell?
An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?
Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
- Deja Vu
- Posts: 4411
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am
Re: Brad Sewell?
You can't makes Lukey Ball retire and then bring this old hack in.WhyPhilWhy? wrote:An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?
Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
Re: Brad Sewell?
Phil i asked this question in another trade thread, prior to the Beams bombshell, and got pissed on:WhyPhilWhy? wrote:An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?
Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
TRADE WEEK PREDICTIONS
http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopi ... ght=sewell
piedys wrote:Anybody open to Sewell, for a very late pick?
Looks like his race might be run at Hawthorn by as early as thursday.
Would be a one-season contract, effectively replacing Ball for extraction, and to take the hits in the centre, as his leg speed is seemingly lost too.
Short term band aid selection only, until we get this Adams and Thomas situation nutted out by 2016.
Dyso
Stupied wrote:No thanks. Why would we get rid of Ball, only to recruit an inferior version of him who's the same age?
Piesnchess is on board for this too:RudeBoy wrote: Adams is a better player than Ball. Sewell is inferior to both.
DysoAz wrote:What a magnificent spit in the face to Bally that would be. Thanks Luke, but you're too old and you'll be playing a lot of VFL next year. Oh by the way, we'll be picking up your 30 year old mate Sewell who is also a slow paced insider with dodgy calfs and hamstrings.Piesnchess wrote:Look, next year our Baby Pies are gonna be so young, some of us may have to go on Nanny duties down at the Club. ! What we really need, IMHO, is to recruit 2 senior guys, too help guide the young fledglings Pies. Now, if brad sewell misses out on the GF this week, hed be one id definitely want on, say, a 2 year deal, hed take over from Ball. We really need some experienced guys now, what wiith Beams leaving too, we will be the Leagues youngest Creche. !
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
- bwphantom
- Posts: 4375
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 8:01 pm
- Location: Brisbane QLD
- Contact:
- Jezza
- Posts: 29542
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 271 times
- Been liked: 349 times
Great player but he wouldn't be a part of our long-term future plans. If we got him for literally nothing and he led by example for a year or two with our young list I'd consider it.
Sewell is out of contract at the end of next year by the way so it's not likely we'll pursue him.
Sewell is out of contract at the end of next year by the way so it's not likely we'll pursue him.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- themonk
- Posts: 2225
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm
Sewell is past it in terms of providing consistency over a complete season but this is not a bad idea.Big T wrote:I think whatever the case it pays to bring people either on field or off field from the best club in the land, and that is Hawthorn.
Sewell in this case knows how they train, how they meet, how the eat, how they crap. That can be of great benefit.
Let's not forget we have Macaffer & Scharenberg on the long term injury list next year so we could fit him in for 1 year, he can help out with the development of our younger players a hopefully play 12-16 decent games.