Farewell #33 Jack Ginnivan
Moderator: bbmods
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 27 times
- Been liked: 31 times
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26202
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 94 times
An open note to Jack.
Jack, I implore you to play the whistle, not for the whistle. You’ve been targeted and arguably unfairly but you have to pay the whistle. If you’ve earned the free kick, the whistle will come. If you haven’t, or the free doesn’t come you have to still be relevant in the contest. People keep saying if your name was Selwood they would be paid and maybe so but Selwood plays to the whistle. Sure he drops the knees and rolls the shoulder but he extracts the ball. Makes the tackle. Gets the kick. He doesn’t flop to the ground. He doesn’t accentuate the contract. He doesn’t look to the umpire. Playing for the whistle has cost us goals and arguably cost a two goal swing last night.
Please Jack, play the whistle, not for the whistle!
Please Jack, play the whistle, not for the whistle!
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
-
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:38 pm
So, he has to act like he’s not acting to get a free?Meredith1965 wrote:I could not agree more. If he had not flailed with his arms he might have got that in the back call. But no experienced umpire pays frees that look to be accentuated by the player.
I think the OP is misplaced. Jack does play the whistle. I’ve never seen him whinge even we he’s had his head pulled off.
He’s the recipient of the worst treatment of an individual in many years. It’s not him that has to change. It’s the AFL and the umpires department.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
^i want to see him smash it, he could be anything. Go back and look at some of the season. He will get tackled high, not get the free then throw his head back in disappointment.
I’m not berating or blaming him, just want him to “do a Selwood” and if he gets the free it’s a bonus.
He over played the push yesterday. Had he not he might have gotten the free but he would have at least stopped the play on.
The good thing about him is he gets on with it which is great.
I’m not berating or blaming him, just want him to “do a Selwood” and if he gets the free it’s a bonus.
He over played the push yesterday. Had he not he might have gotten the free but he would have at least stopped the play on.
The good thing about him is he gets on with it which is great.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
First comment, yes exactly.dalyc wrote:So, he has to act like he’s not acting to get a free?Meredith1965 wrote:I could not agree more. If he had not flailed with his arms he might have got that in the back call. But no experienced umpire pays frees that look to be accentuated by the player.
I think the OP is misplaced. Jack does play the whistle. I’ve never seen him whinge even we he’s had his head pulled off.
He’s the recipient of the worst treatment of an individual in many years. It’s not him that has to change. It’s the AFL and the umpires department.
Second I disagree but he does get on with it after the fact. His flopping was more the case in point.
Third, unlikely. It’s the way he’s being umpired. Let the club deal with that, he just needs to get on with it..
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
-
- Posts: 16634
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 28 times
The problem today for him was the forward line structure due to a lack of personnel. He ought to be a front-and-centre rover, not a marking option. Given his size a lot of the ball that goes to him is ridiculous.
In contrast, Jamie and Ash are classical leading forwards, so the lack of a big marking target who should be drawing defenders and clearing channels, also messes them up but in a different way.
Instead, though we have some good entries, too many long bombs are lobbed over everyone's heads, including that of Ginni, because we lack that monster target in tandem with Checkers. This is naturally worse in high pressure games because it's harder to lower the eyes or steady.
Of course, he also still lacks the tank to carry the ball in from up the ground regularly (though he tried to work up the ground today), so that's what his next goal needs to be as we recruit another big forward who can bust packs, clear channels, bring the ball to ground, and take the odd grab off scrubby kicks.
Ginni's game is fine; the forward line structure/balance isn't.
In contrast, Jamie and Ash are classical leading forwards, so the lack of a big marking target who should be drawing defenders and clearing channels, also messes them up but in a different way.
Instead, though we have some good entries, too many long bombs are lobbed over everyone's heads, including that of Ginni, because we lack that monster target in tandem with Checkers. This is naturally worse in high pressure games because it's harder to lower the eyes or steady.
Of course, he also still lacks the tank to carry the ball in from up the ground regularly (though he tried to work up the ground today), so that's what his next goal needs to be as we recruit another big forward who can bust packs, clear channels, bring the ball to ground, and take the odd grab off scrubby kicks.
Ginni's game is fine; the forward line structure/balance isn't.
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Agreed. The thing about this kid is not only what he does on the ball but off it. He’s smart and works damn hard. For such a young player he plays well above his experience and chronological age. I too think the OP is misplaced.Pies4shaw wrote:I thought he was very hard at it for a young player in his first final. I was impressed with his effort. He could easily have had two or three goals if the umpiring had been even adequate - but mainly I thought he competed well.
Wasn’t there a song (not a good one at that) called “Do what you do do well” ?
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Exactly, he never whinges just gets on with it, the op. We’re to watch the game I stead of reading big footy it listening to KCwatt price tully wrote:Agreed. The thing about this kid is not only what he does on the ball but off it. He’s smart and works damn hard. For such a young player he plays well above his experience and chronological age. I too think the OP is misplaced.Pies4shaw wrote:I thought he was very hard at it for a young player in his first final. I was impressed with his effort. He could easily have had two or three goals if the umpiring had been even adequate - but mainly I thought he competed well.
Wasn’t there a song (not a good one at that) called “Do what you do do well” ?
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!