Post inauguration Trump:

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

105 isn't bad for your height. My cuz is slightly shorter than me and is 120kg.

Do the Aston RX program, you'll be 95kg in 28 days. https://astonrx.com/
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20132
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by What'sinaname »

So in 2020, Trump proposes to ban TikTok for national security and the MSM lose their collective tits.

Biden announces a ban on TikTok, followed by other national leaders and the MSM say nothing.

So, Trump was right, right?
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
doriswilgus
Posts: 5350
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: the great southern land
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by doriswilgus »

You always sound so agitated about everything these days,especially your dear Trump.^Not happy with the way things are going,are you?
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

TDS works both ways.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
David
Posts: 50682
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

Correct.

Almost like when Trump promised to pull out of Afghanistan, then Biden did it and Trump called it a foreign policy disaster. People are hypocrites, more news at 6!
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

The ABC will be broadcasting Sarah Ferguson’s forensic review of Trump and Fox which had the extremist nutters from the Murdoch Press foam at the mouth ( extremist nutters seems to be a tautology when placed before Murdoch Press)

A rerun of the Big Lie

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/comme ... he-big-lie

Marvellous
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

I thought you meant the previous duchess of york!

In my Facebook memories a meme came up of an advertising sign ata Mexican restaurant, “Mexican food so authentic, you-all build a wall around it!’
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Chickens coming home to roost:

The rape trial of Trump in New York might just be a significant hit in Trump:

His lawyers are doing a great job in rubbing those that matter the wrong way.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... p-assault/
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

Civil Trial, can't see it making a lot of difference either way.

Even if found guilty, it's not a criminal conviction and wouldn't (I don't think) prevent him running for POTUS again and will likely change very few opinions. Most people would have fixed their view on Trump a long time ago.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50682
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

Agreed about it being unlikely to change many minds or have much legal consequence. If the case succeeds, though, that layer of teflon will be thinner than ever.

And more importantly beside the political fallout, there's some potential for justice to be done here, because either Trump did what was alleged or the plaintiff is lying, and an allegation this serious deserves to be tested in some kind of court. I may be in the minority here, but I'm open-minded as to the facts here and will be interested in the outcome.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

I'm open minded about it too, I haven't read a lot about it but on the surface I'd say it's roughly 50-50 whether it happened or not.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Marvellous. Donald Trump guilty of sexual assault and defamation amongst others. Excellent. More court cases to follow.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... t-justice/

Chickens coming home to roost. Karma baby.

If you were following the case the strongest witness against Donald Trump was Donald Trump. He was caught out lying on more than one occasion. Even sweeter.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

Bizarre case.

Trump didn't attend and didn't give evidence, the court relied on a video deposition he filmed with the prosocution lawyer last year and while trumps lawyer cross examined the prosocution witnesses, they put up no defence, called no witnesses.

Found not guilty of rape but guilty of assault and defammation. Apart from Caroll being $5M richer, can't see this having any impact on anything.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

stui magpie wrote:Bizarre case.

Trump didn't attend and didn't give evidence, the court relied on a video deposition he filmed with the prosocution lawyer last year and while trumps lawyer cross examined the prosocution witnesses, they put up no defence, called no witnesses.

Found not guilty of rape but guilty of assault and defammation. Apart from Caroll being $5M richer, can't see this having any impact on anything.
Firmly disagree. This is the start of the house of cards collapsing. First of many.

Much of the evidence that became public showed him to be a liar by his own words:

Misidentifying the accuser for one of his wives saying “she’s not his type”
Saying he never shops at the Department store where the abuse took place directly contradicted by employees who served him in those stores
And of course the infamous he can “grab women’s pussies …” amongst others

Those sitting on the fence that is, the independent or non MAGA republicans will have more reason to not support him. Positive news for women victims of sexual abuse and rape.

This adds to the rest of the legal actions underway against Trump.

Marvellous
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
David
Posts: 50682
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

A better article on the case here:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-10/ ... /102320056

Strange how, in US civil law, the main allegation can be dismissed but the lesser can be upheld. The effective conclusion seems to be that both were lying (i.e. that Trump did something to Carroll but not what she’s claiming), which is obviously pretty unsatisfactory for a case in which one would assume that one of the two parties were telling the truth.

Defamation aside, what, precisely, did the court find to have taken place here?

Whether it sways absolutely anyone from the Trump side remains to be seen, I guess.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Post Reply