Phantom Top 10

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9547
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 37 times

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

Sorry, Kit can't be in the Top 10. He went under the father-son rule.
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

lol. sensational phil.
Get back on top.
wigboy
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 8:25 am

Post by wigboy »

Just come across the stats for sharp this year. averaging 26.7 poss per game.
14.7 kicks 12 handballs and 4.9 marks
User avatar
Johnson#26
Posts: 24763
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am

Post by Johnson#26 »

Joel wrote:If anyone would like to do a phanton draft for the top 10 or 20 players, for Nick's Collingwood Page, feel free to do so, and give me a yell. Make sure they are well researched though. I will put them together in one article.
You can use mine if you want - check your PM's.

Deluca must be very good if he isn't allowed to go this season. What about Eddie Betts? I've heard that he is a bit of a Rodan.

Good to hear Sharp is quick - because that is a must. Same with Tambling - the faster the better.
User avatar
Nath
Posts: 2014
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Victoria

Post by Nath »

Johnno, Eddie Betts has been invited to the National Draft Camp which is held at the AIS in October, which automatically means that at least four clubs have listed him in the top 30 draftees they would be interested in viewing further.

I spose Eddie's problem is that he is small, and quite small at that. He is relatively well built, but he lacks genuine height, even for a rover. If he gets picked, I'd imagine it's be in the bottom half of the draft, but no doubt there is a team out there that would be interested in pursuing him, his skills dictate that he can play forward and back, which differs from the stereotypical mecurial aboriginal forward, but I wouldn't think that the Pies would be interested.
User avatar
Johnson#26
Posts: 24763
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am

Post by Johnson#26 »

Nath wrote:I spose Eddie's problem is that he is small, and quite small at that. He is relatively well built, but he lacks genuine height, even for a rover. If he gets picked, I'd imagine it's be in the bottom half of the draft, but no doubt there is a team out there that would be interested in pursuing him, his skills dictate that he can play forward and back, which differs from the stereotypical mecurial aboriginal forward, but I wouldn't think that the Pies would be interested.
Its sad that small players are fading out. Only guys like Burns, Lockyer and Brent Harvey are still surviving. Rodan will be gone by next year.

If Betts is quick, we should have a look. I though Craig Ednie (Richmond 2002) would have been a good player, but his lack of height counted against him. Bettts would be worth a shot late in the draft.
Post Reply