Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 9:39 pm
Hopefully they can pay 300 of his 500 per year to help get Treloar’s deficit off our books.Cam wrote:There was a rumour he would be at the Roos for two years before returning.
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://nick.magpies.net/
Hopefully they can pay 300 of his 500 per year to help get Treloar’s deficit off our books.Cam wrote:There was a rumour he would be at the Roos for two years before returning.
His 500 a year is finished after this year, he will be on small money next deal. He got the arse more because of his behaviour than anything. Don't shoot the messenger, just saying what I had read somewhere.Raw Hammer wrote:Hopefully they can pay 300 of his 500 per year to help get Treloar’s deficit off our books.Cam wrote:There was a rumour he would be at the Roos for two years before returning.
Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hard pass. Move on. Adding to the fact that it would be a backwards step, the only players we have recruited (almost) since we moved him on are small forwards. I think we are adequately covered with the likes of Ginni, Henry, Elliot who are all better than him.piedys wrote:Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hindsight tells us Beams was emotionally and physically volatile when he returned to us, yet we were blinded by him being the missing piece in the jigsaw that would return us to glory in 2019; the logic was solid, but the cost at trade table was high, and ultimately a bust.
Stephenson is still young, injury free, has several pre-seasons under his belt, but with a few nasties living rent-free in his head. I feel he is salvageable, and if available, then certainly affordable. His upside is high - we have seen it.
The question needs to be asked though later in season: do the players WANT him back? If it's a yes, then off to counselling with him for a recalibration and a fresh start. A F50 with Stevo and Ginni running riot is bums on seats for the club in 2023, no question.
Then again, he might pull his finger out and turn it on for North - it is all up to him...
I totally get what you are saying, but... Elliott might play his last game due to an unforseen injury, quite suddenly. We know his history, and i'm surprised he has come back so quickly from that shoulder problem against WCE.piffdog wrote:Hard pass. Move on. Adding to the fact that it would be a backwards step, the only players we have recruited (almost) since we moved him on are small forwards. I think we are adequately covered with the likes of Ginni, Henry, Elliot who are all better than him.
piedys wrote:Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hindsight tells us Beams was emotionally and physically volatile when he returned to us, yet we were blinded by him being the missing piece in the jigsaw that would return us to glory in 2019; the logic was solid, but the cost at trade table was high, and ultimately a bust.
Stephenson is still young, injury free, has several pre-seasons under his belt, but with a few nasties living rent-free in his head. I feel he is salvageable, and if available, then certainly affordable. His upside is high - we have seen it.
The question needs to be asked though later in season: do the players WANT him back? If it's a yes, then off to counselling with him for a recalibration and a fresh start. A F50 with Stevo and Ginni running riot is bums on seats for the club in 2023, no question.
Then again, he might pull his finger out and turn it on for North - it is all up to him...
Of course - that's the first question really!derkd wrote:Important secondary question....let's say Collingwood did want him back and, North were happy to hand him back for some agreed price.. Would Stephenson even want to come back to the club that moved him on? (Leaving aside all the other many issues).