Hopefully they can pay 300 of his 500 per year to help get Treloar’s deficit off our books.Cam wrote:There was a rumour he would be at the Roos for two years before returning.
Atu and Stephenson
Moderator: bbmods
- Raw Hammer
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
- Location: The Gutter
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 4 times
- Rd10.1998_11.1#36
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
- Location: Sevilla, Spain
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 5 times
Who would seriously consider bringing Stevo back?
When he left, nobody wanted him except the worst team in the league
What has changed for the better since then? Bike tricks, getting flogged week in week out and being dropped for lack of effort is supposed to make him desirable now?
McRae would be insane to agree, would set a terrible example for a new coach
When he left, nobody wanted him except the worst team in the league
What has changed for the better since then? Bike tricks, getting flogged week in week out and being dropped for lack of effort is supposed to make him desirable now?
McRae would be insane to agree, would set a terrible example for a new coach
- Cam
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Springvale
- Has liked: 19 times
- Been liked: 28 times
His 500 a year is finished after this year, he will be on small money next deal. He got the arse more because of his behaviour than anything. Don't shoot the messenger, just saying what I had read somewhere.Raw Hammer wrote:Hopefully they can pay 300 of his 500 per year to help get Treloar’s deficit off our books.Cam wrote:There was a rumour he would be at the Roos for two years before returning.
Get back on top.
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hindsight tells us Beams was emotionally and physically volatile when he returned to us, yet we were blinded by him being the missing piece in the jigsaw that would return us to glory in 2019; the logic was solid, but the cost at trade table was high, and ultimately a bust.
Stephenson is still young, injury free, has several pre-seasons under his belt, but with a few nasties living rent-free in his head. I feel he is salvageable, and if available, then certainly affordable. His upside is high - we have seen it.
The question needs to be asked though later in season: do the players WANT him back? If it's a yes, then off to counselling with him for a recalibration and a fresh start. A F50 with Stevo and Ginni running riot is bums on seats for the club in 2023, no question.
Then again, he might pull his finger out and turn it on for North - it is all up to him...
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
Hard pass. Move on. Adding to the fact that it would be a backwards step, the only players we have recruited (almost) since we moved him on are small forwards. I think we are adequately covered with the likes of Ginni, Henry, Elliot who are all better than him.piedys wrote:Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hindsight tells us Beams was emotionally and physically volatile when he returned to us, yet we were blinded by him being the missing piece in the jigsaw that would return us to glory in 2019; the logic was solid, but the cost at trade table was high, and ultimately a bust.
Stephenson is still young, injury free, has several pre-seasons under his belt, but with a few nasties living rent-free in his head. I feel he is salvageable, and if available, then certainly affordable. His upside is high - we have seen it.
The question needs to be asked though later in season: do the players WANT him back? If it's a yes, then off to counselling with him for a recalibration and a fresh start. A F50 with Stevo and Ginni running riot is bums on seats for the club in 2023, no question.
Then again, he might pull his finger out and turn it on for North - it is all up to him...
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
I totally get what you are saying, but... Elliott might play his last game due to an unforseen injury, quite suddenly. We know his history, and i'm surprised he has come back so quickly from that shoulder problem against WCE.piffdog wrote:Hard pass. Move on. Adding to the fact that it would be a backwards step, the only players we have recruited (almost) since we moved him on are small forwards. I think we are adequately covered with the likes of Ginni, Henry, Elliot who are all better than him.
I have Henry pegged to play the Elliott role in time; just saying Stevo could be a free hit at redemption, on a strict contract which wouldn't cost much more than a first year player.
He has the talent, we need it back. Don't hold any grudges peeps; we sacked him, Treloar and Phillips - none of whom were seeking contracts elsewhere.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
piedys wrote:Well that's the Cautionary Tale scenario, but... you'd have to assess both scenarios on their merits perhaps?Jezza wrote:Bringing back Stephenson gives me vibes of bringing Beams back a few years ago.
Sometimes it's best to let go of the past and look elsewhere for the future.
Hindsight tells us Beams was emotionally and physically volatile when he returned to us, yet we were blinded by him being the missing piece in the jigsaw that would return us to glory in 2019; the logic was solid, but the cost at trade table was high, and ultimately a bust.
Stephenson is still young, injury free, has several pre-seasons under his belt, but with a few nasties living rent-free in his head. I feel he is salvageable, and if available, then certainly affordable. His upside is high - we have seen it.
The question needs to be asked though later in season: do the players WANT him back? If it's a yes, then off to counselling with him for a recalibration and a fresh start. A F50 with Stevo and Ginni running riot is bums on seats for the club in 2023, no question.
Then again, he might pull his finger out and turn it on for North - it is all up to him...
Important secondary question....let's say Collingwood did want him back and, North were happy to hand him back for some agreed price.. Would Stephenson even want to come back to the club that moved him on? (Leaving aside all the other many issues).
"To know nothing of events before your birth, is to forever remain a child" - Cicero (Roman Lawyer/Senator) 46 BCE.
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
Of course - that's the first question really!derkd wrote:Important secondary question....let's say Collingwood did want him back and, North were happy to hand him back for some agreed price.. Would Stephenson even want to come back to the club that moved him on? (Leaving aside all the other many issues).
If the rumour were proved to be true, you'd firstly presume that he WANTS to return [with his tail between his legs you'd expect] to reignite his career.
Then the players would need to be consulted, namely all those listed prior to his abrupt 2020 exit.
Seems all those responsible for departure of Stephenson, Phillips and Treloar departed during 2021 season?
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
I have trouble believing the rumour, simply because a lot can change at a footy club over a two year period. It’s just not the sort of thing three “ professional “ parties ( two clubs and a manager ) would agree to and there hasn’t been much more change at a club than Collingwood in the last 12 months. And if all that isn’t enough, I reckon our VFL team is going well enough without him.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54839
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 131 times
- Been liked: 166 times
- Lazza
- Posts: 12836
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
If he becomes available the club has to assess if the pro’s outweigh the con’s. I don’t have enough info to make that call but no doubt the club will.
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
-
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm
Hearing he is keen to sort himself out and that the Club culture (i.e fans) are/would be a strong motivator.....don't shoot the mailman, but no smoke without fire
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"
Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer